Graduate students who are told that they should not waste their time reviewing books are being taught, implicitly, to reckon their time solely in terms of individual profit and loss.Were this sort of attitude replicated across the whole of the academy, intellectual life would, in my view, become more impoverished as a consequence.Even edited collections and textbooks will have particular features intended to make them distinctive in the proverbial marketplace of ideas. If there is an identifiable thesis statement, you may consider quoting it directly. Some basic biographical information about the author(s) or editor(s) of the book you are reviewing is necessary. How might the work you are reviewing fit into a wider research or career trajectory? A reasonably thorough indication of the research methods used (if applicable) and of the range of substantive material covered in the book should be included. Identify one particular area in which you think the book does well.Tags: Compare Contrast Essay ThesisExample Of Term Paper OutlineGood Graduate School Application EssaysBlood Brothers Essay HelpNy Bar Exam Essay QuestionsEssays - Cause & Effect - UnemploymentNursing Assignment
Although of course this may vary slightly by discipline and/or publication venue, my advice is, if in doubt, to use the following framework, with one paragraph for each of the following seven sections: Introduction.
All good pieces of academic writing should have an introduction, and book reviews are no exception.
Clarify all details about your assignment to prepare for a research. We suggest finding a quiet place where you can focus and read without being distracted.
Make sure you know the deadline, features of formatting, and a required word count. Note interesting details about main characters and plot twists.
While this weakness might be related to something you actually believe to be incorrect, it is more likely to be something that the author omitted, or neglected to address in sufficient detail. End your review with a concluding statement summarizing your opinion of the book.
You should also explicitly identify a range of audiences whom you think would appreciate reading or otherwise benefit from the book.Open with a general description of the topic and/or problem addressed by the work in question.Think, if possible, of a hook to draw your readers in. Your review should, as concisely as possible, summarize the book’s argument. What particular sorts of qualifications and expertise do they bring to the subject?Some journals will publish or otherwise advertise the books they have available for review, and then it is just a matter of putting yourself forward for one of them.Or, if all else fails, you might even try emailing an editor directly and suggesting a newly published book that you think would be of relevance to the subject area of that editor’s journal.Most journals, though, also accept reactive commissions, where a potential writer him/herself reaches out and proposes a review, and many will accept them from graduate students.If you are keen to write your first book review, a reactive commission is probably the way to go.To write a good book report, you have to read the book and note all necessary details.Start with an outline — it’s a very useful thing that can simplify the whole writing process significantly.Proactive commissioning is where an editor seeks out potential reviewers and solicits their contribution.Obviously, you are more likely to be targeted for this if you already have an established reputation in your field of expertise, and some journals will only publish reviews which have been proactively commissioned.