Generally, it is believed that the psychological and social health of a person is based on awareness of both one’s own individuality and uniqueness and group identity, as well as one’s belonging to all humanity.
Generally, it is believed that the psychological and social health of a person is based on awareness of both one’s own individuality and uniqueness and group identity, as well as one’s belonging to all humanity.Tags: Organizational Methods For Compare And Contrast EssaysWord Counter EssayPunctuating Movie Titles EssayWriting Economics Research PaperLiterature Review On Research MethodologyEssay Writing On Photography
In addition, as Myers (2012) puts this, it is an attribution error that makes an individual biased in the interpretation of one’s own group members’ behavior as positive, whereas positive actions committed by the members of an out-group are usually not taken into account.
In general, we sometimes make judgments or start communicating with someone having nothing but a stereotype at hand.
Meanwhile, attitudes can easily match the social hierarchy not only because they justify it, but also because occurring discrimination affects those who become its victims, and so the social beliefs can turn into self-fulfilling prophecies, as Myers (2012) and Feenstra (2013) argue.
In addition, identifying ourselves with certain groups, we include social identification into the personal one (i.e. As Myers (2012) marks, categorizing people into groups, we thus contrast our group to other groups (“they”) with a clear predisposition and manifestation of favoritism for our own groups.
Thus, if status inequality creates prejudice, the society should strive to create relationships where cooperation and social equality will dominate.
In particular, if we know that some type of discrimination is based on prejudice, we need to get rid of discrimination, but depriving it of any institutional support.In such cases, stereotypes and prejudice are able to fully deprive of objectivity and distort the interpretation and memories of people and environment.The modern view of prejudice arising due to the recent studies leads us to an idea of how stereotypical thinking becomes a byproduct of information processing – a method individuals apply to simplify the perception of the world.Indeed, the shaped prejudices are kept up mainly by inertia, as Feenstra (2013) reasonably notes.If a prejudice is accepted by the society, the majority will prefer to take the path of least and will promote stereotypes not so much because of the need to hate someone as because of the desire to be accepted and valued by this society.Their cognitive component contains distorted, irrational, absurd knowledge about objects that do not meet the changing reality.With respect to inanimate objects this refers, for example, to all sorts of superstitions, but in the social sphere, stereotypes and prejudices widely serve as the justification of racial, ethnic, class and economic differences.Therefore, stereotypes are resilient and difficult to modify.And yet, there are some reserve methods that can weaken them.According to Inzlicht and Schmader (2011), the specificity of this approach lies in the unconscious division of people into “us” and “them” with ingroup experiences perceived as idealized and endowed with pculiarities in a positive way (autostereotype), while outgroups are endowed with negative assessments (heterostereotype).As a result, stereotypes form a simplified and highly superficial understanding of the social reality phenomena.