Tags: Music And Culture EssayVisual Analysis Essay OutlineHistory Essay AssignmentsLiterary Term Paper ProposalsRubric For Ap Literature EssayCustom Essays ServicesCornell Essay WinnersValue Of Public Service EssayArgumentative Essay On Standardized Testing
This article is about the primary issues upon which people differ in their assessments as to the value, role and relative safety of nuclear power.
For public protests about nuclear power, see Anti-nuclear movement.
For public support for nuclear energy, see Pro-nuclear movement.
The debate continues today between those who fear the power of nuclear and those who fear what will happen to the earth if humanity doesn't use nuclear power.
At the 1963 ground-breaking for what would become the world's largest nuclear power plant, President John F.
Along with the fears associated with nuclear weapons proliferation, nuclear power opponents fear sabotage by terrorists of nuclear plants, diversion and misuse of radioactive fuels or fuel waste, as well as naturally-occurring leakage from the unsolved and imperfect long-term storage process of radioactive nuclear waste.
They further argue that when all the energy-intensive stages of the nuclear fuel chain are considered, from uranium mining to nuclear decommissioning, nuclear power is not a low-carbon electricity source.
Use of nuclear power provides plentiful, well-paying jobs, energy security, reduces a dependence on imported fuels and exposure to price risks associated with resource speculation and Middle East politics.
in contrast to the massive amount of pollution and carbon emission generated from burning fossil fuels like coal, oil and natural gas.
about the risks and benefits of using nuclear reactors to generate electricity for civilian purposes.
The debate about nuclear power peaked during the 1970s and 1980s, as more and more reactors were built and came online, and "reached an intensity unprecedented in the history of technology controversies" in some countries.